Wednesday, January 3, 2007

Is Tiffany Towers Married

The misinterpretation Legion badge

Typical is the use of the representatives of Kalkriese-Varusschlacht hypothesis the four tanks found Close , by Franzius ( Georgia Franzius The Roman finds from Kalkriese, Brampton 1993) were first assigned the correct cavalry. On a clasp of a chain armor found on the underside of a hallmark, which Franzius for woman how to read " M. Aius I Fabrici " and "Legionnaire M. Aius in the first cohort in the centuries of translate Fabricius "was. This way it makes its own archaeological research result "four armored cavalry closing" for the closing itself into question, because these people purport to I. cohort to the foot soldiers hearing.

listen here now slowly on the fun: Because Varus perished in Kalkriese with the legions XVII, XVIII and XIX, but not the Legion I. Germanica Augusta , so there may not be true, what should not be true, had the Legion ID I, which had actually been - from a rider who was 16 AD to I. Legion of Germanicus - as a legionary cohort identifier to be read. For Varus had at the end no more cavalry, because they deserted! In fact, 16 AD Germanicus was among other things, the First Legion plus cavalry on Angrivarierwall in Kalkriese: a clear proof against the "Battle of Varus Kalkriese" hypothesis.
The
Kalkrieser are so caught up in their own world that they have to translate compulsively even clear falsification to verification of their hypothesis is And it also madness, yet he has method.

Not the cohort, but the Legion is the identifier and the pride of Roman soldiers. Archaeologists find Legion handles on bricks, on buildings, on bronze tablets ... but not the primary cohort identifiers. As with the V-shaped ditches of the Roman legions in Kalkriese, it has to serve for the Legion ID I an outlandish reinterpretation - without any precedent in archeology.

is probably these are the new methods of "Battlefield Archeology" of its inventor Rost Kalkriese. It is the giant limestone not only managed to persuade Frank Berger with his rather critical Münzbefunden, but also Georgia Franzius the desired interpretations - and keep them from unwanted results. We must not forget that the Legion identifiers refer to all of the coin hoards of Kalkriese exclusively to legions of Germanicus.

If now the managing director of the Museum Park Kalkriese all critics smugly replies that one can not but expect that Varus had deposited his card, he must of course right, because that was never in Kalkriese and at the time of the Battle of Kalkriese was seven years dead

The discovery of the tanks close one has inadvertently demonstrated the presence of a Roman cavalry unit, an Ala, which did in the army of Germanicus service or under Caecina - and BC already under Domitius Ahenobarbus . Because on the inside of a vaginal clamp sword, which has since been found in Kalkriese ( Georgia Franzius and Rainer Wiegand, a Gladiusscheide fittings and parts of a cingulum from Kalkriese, in: Germania, No. 1, 2000, p. 567 -607 ) can be a scribe with inscription " Domitii " of Domitius (Ahenobarbus) Decode although the co-author of Franzius contribution, Rainer Wiegand, rejects this (see Bökemeier Rolf, The Varus Battle, Tübingen 2000, p. 188 ).

Sincerely,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe

0 comments:

Post a Comment