Why Do Grown Men Have Nocturnal Emission

Whether one now comes to its senses and finally the "VARUSSCHLACHT" signs depend? Or the museum is a big joke, an archaeological Disney park?

case Varus "hatchet buried," prosecutor
ended proceedings to place the historic Battle (Westfalen-Blatt of 6.7.2007) by Ernst-Wilhelm Pape detmold / Osnabrück (WB). The prosecution has finished the Osnabrück legal dispute over the location of the legendary Battle of Varus in 9 AD.

The managing director of nonprofit "Varus battle in Osnabrück Land GmbH - Museum and Park," Joseph Rottmann, have rightly sought public funding and occupied, said prosecutor Sven Bendheuer. In addition, the museum has held back any findings. After intensive investigations, the criminal proceedings had been terminated because of subsidy fraud against Rottmann.

has a view on the anniversary celebrations 2000 Years Varus Battle in 2009 and the new basis for discussion of the District Administrator of lip, Friedel Heuwinkel (CDU), yesterday called for an end to the dispute over the location of the Varus Battle. Heuwinkel: "We should bury the hatchet and no longer argue about whether the historic battle in the Teutoburg Forest Kalkriese or has taken place in lip," recalls in Detmold in 1875, the Hermann monument to the defeat of the Romans.. The Varus Battle is an event of international standing. They helped drive the Romans once and for all from the north of Germania.

In a criminal complaint had varus researcher Gerhard Tiggelkamp (72) from Bad Kreuznach expressed the suspicion that would be withheld in Kalkriese findings clearly show that Hermann the Cherusci (Arminius) and his Germans in the year 9 AD, the Roman state Varus and have not defeated in his legions Kalkriese in Osnabrück.

The institutions and the non-profit sponsors, the foundation of the savings banks in the Osnabrück region and district of Osnabrück, had been misled nor injured, said Bendheuer. The County had stated that it promotes the excavations of a Roman-Germanic battlefield and not the result of the excavations.
The question of whether the Varus battle took place in Kalkriese or not, is not for the financial support has been crucial.

The county had also stressed that there was no evidence in the legal sense, the years after 2000 clearly demonstrated that the Varus battle took place in Kalkriese.

Even the discovery of the oral question sheet which will be issued over the years in the museum, change the legal situation, said the prosecutor. There are many possible explanations for how the plate in the Kalkrieser Area could be reached. Maybe it was - on whatever way - come only after the year 9 AD there. Maybe it was - on whatever way - come into possession of a member of the troops of Varus. Bendheuer. May "This find is therefore not prove that the Kalkrieser battle must be dated after the year, nine AD"

The prosecution had also determined in the museum. According to Bendheuer in Kalkriese many questions would be raised for the location of the Varus Battle. a clear proof that Kalkriese was the slaughter, there was not. This will also charge by the museum represented Sun

Also, the Lower Saxony Ministry of Science, emphasized that there is clear evidence for the claim Kalkriese is no ifs and buts lacks the site of the Varus Battle.
Ministry spokesman Bernhard Kurt Neubert, "Kalkriese is a historically interesting place. are therefore encouraged the excavations. "
WB article from 06.07.2007

Chlorine Ruining Hair Color

Angrivarierwall

very first discoveries of spin Bleien had the visiting of the Varus Battle hypothesis 9 AD AD to Angrivarierwall hypothesis 16th can bring, because there are among all the relevant ancient sources bellum Germanicum only one site, highlighting the Schleudererexplizit: Tacitus, Annals II, 20 - But not the Varus Battle. The passage reads: "Sensit dux impar comminuspugnam remotisque paulum legionibus funditores libritoresque excuteretela et proturbare hostem iubet" noted Germanicus, as unlike the melee and was therefore took the legions back a bit to command the slingers and throw shooters, their floors to and send to expel the enemy from the Wall .

This translation fits in perfectly with the description of the fighting around the Angrivarierwall in Tacitus, when one weeds out his two errors, namely (1) the claim that the Angrivarierwall was built as a dividing line against the Cherusci and (2) Weser was still in the vicinity been. These errors are not about mistakes, but conscious manipulation to Germanicus to make it look better to admit as Tiberius and the glaring failure of this commander against Arminius not have to.

Then read Tacitus II, 19/20 like an exact description of the topography Kalkriese . The legions are then east on the return march of the allegedly lossless victorious battle of Idistaviso derWeser and want to return to their ships on the river Ems (19) "people and the nobles, old and young men rushed suddenly to the Roman marching column, and brought her into confusion . Finally she picks a battlefield, the of ... Forest and was surrounded in which a narrow, marshy area was [Niewedder Valley] . Also, to the forest area ran a deep bog [Great Moor, in the North] , only one side of the Angrivarier had increased by a large dam ... . Here, the Germanic infantry went into position, the cavalry was in nearby clearings coverage to the Roman legions as they were marched into the forest to fall in denRücken. (20) Those Romans, which was assigned to the level ground, easily broke into the forest, whereas the others had to storm the mound had, just as if a Walls were approaching, hurt by the heavy blows from above. (Here the slingers now come into play, above). At the top of his Praetorian cohorts Germanicus conquered the wall and made his assault on the forest, where senior man against man. The enemy had in the back of the marsh, the Romans ... the mountains. Both parts had to necessarily maintain their position, they could rely only on their manly courage and hope for salvation only by a victory. "

Most researchers now suspect the Angrivarierwall rightly so as well as the" Herakles east-grove "of the Idistaviso Weser, because Tacitus twice "the river" can be incorporated into the text, which he certainly several times before the called Weser said. Another error is in Tacitus's claim that the Wall Angrivarier had built a charm against Cherusci. That would have taken a very long and very high dam! In fact used the Angrivarier this as an excuse against Germanicus and Stertinius after they had already done with the Cherusci common cause against the Romans: They had tried everything, from the Cherusci delineate how one can see from the dam, etc.! The generals were in fact happy that they let the Angrivarier pull safely to the great losses in the Ems Kalkriese: (22) "As they were unconditional, they received their pardon for all crimes."

In fact, the Romans were only moderately like this could so but to save face. Tacitus deliberately and with help Germanicus further than radiant hero because of failure to represent the line. In contrast Tiberius is portrayed as the evil, Germanicus not begrudge his success and why it called back to Rome. In fact, he had long since realized that the war was unwinnable. But he knew from his many years of operations in Germania, the conditions there more closely and much better than its predecessor Augustus.

While Wolters as a recognized archaeologist and sound ester Varusschlacht Kalkriese-in-the-critics Angrivarierwall recognize, but offers the Longi Pontes as a solution, then this is certainly the fact that he twice mentioned the river (Weser) in Tacitus than face value, rather than a forgery of the writer takes. Otherwise he would probably have noticed that leave the Wilbers-Rost returns to ditch as Germanic Schanz work easily refuted from the Tacitus describing the Angrivarierwall: (21) "late in the day moved Germanicus a legion of battle; to dig trenches around a camp . The remaining saturated until the onset of darkness in the blood of the enemy. The battle of the cavalry remained undecided. In Kalkriese thus had a bearing gap is found, order to verify the hypothesis of Angrivarierwall; of the giant limestone that danger was recognized, so they turned it into flight, a Germanic Schanz work, but for which there never is a role model.

can better texts and archaeological finds do not fit together!
can
Unfortunately, the early commitment to the Kalkrieser at the Battle of Varus in 9 AD and the main critic of the Wolters Pontes Longi not now take seriously the Varus battle and Pontes-Longi-hypotheses Angrivarierwall hypothesis in more detail with the to take motion.

Sincerely, Prof. Dr. SG Schoppe

How Long Take Off With Chest Infection

TIME

THE TIME
The Stand
took place where once the legendary Varus battle? Just in time for the 2000th Anniversary struggling against competition from Kalkriese in Lower Saxony North Rhine-Westphalia.
by Silke Hellwig
Kalkriese
The Museum Store, the world is still in order. Here are Playmobil Roman, Lavender Oil ('ancient world of plants ") and the sausage" from Harter Hermann. " The inn advertises a "Roman Evening - cena et musica". 550,000 people visit the outdoor plant per year, including only about 1,000 schools. The main attraction is the museum tower, 26 meters in height, the wind tearing at his hair to the visitors, and the view takes your fancy. Far below, on a large grassy area between wooded slopes and valleys, it should have happened - the Varus Battle. Until well into the 20th Century, it was trading as a German foundation myth: Arminius against Varus. Germans against the Romans. In nine AD. Fighting is, to date, albeit in a different occupation.
Kalkriese in the Osnabrück region might not be alone, with his claim, the site of the historic uprising of "Hermann, the Cheruscan." In particular, the adjacent Detmold envies the 850-strong village Kalkriese, area of Brampton in Lower Saxony, its glory. And because between the two rivals the border is now North Rhine-Westphalia, Lower Saxony argue against the Lipper against the Osnabrück region, scientists against amateurs.
blood flow is not, the opponents beharken itself in words. In panel discussions, with articles, books and websites. Fighting is by all means - if not published his findings, is not taken seriously, who does not is professional, is reviled as a "home Hirsch. Of deception and manipulation is the issue of historical distortion and Zitierkartellen. Finally, there is a lot: to reputation, to tourists, for funding and research grants.
The dispute has been brewing generations. More one hundred locations have been identified as a battlefield. That the dispute has now inflamed again, wondering Joseph Rottmann not - he diagnosed a rising "Arminiusfieber: In a half years, the Varus battle marks the 2000th Time and the excavations in Kalkriese speak for themselves, says the CEO of the "Battle of Varus in the Osnabrück region" GmbH. give it finds in 6000 Kalkriese, and "from year to year are new ones that makes us more" secure. Far and wide, let no man vorzuweisen of similar treasures had, "to deal with us on an equal footing."
through the museum leads a fictional investigators called Stahnke
This confidence is documented everywhere: By the museum, contemporary beefed up with multimedia resources, lead investigator of a fictitious websites called Stahnke. At the end of the tour - the trail leading along elegantly lit display cases filled with coins and militaria - Stahl comes to the conclusion: "After all these years we are now certain: Kalkriese is the site of the Varus Battle" Rainer Wiegand, head of the Research Centre Rome and Germany to. the University of Osnabrueck, the recently formulated a bit more cautious. "According to current research, the discovery site in Kalkriese be particularly well-preserved theater in the context of the Varus Battle are called" Because a sentence on any sign Place, would be drivers on the highway simply refer to the "Battle of Varus in the Osnabrück region." These same signs are Siegfried Schoppe, a professor at the University of Hamburg, Institute of Economic History, a thorn in the side.
For him, they manifest, "that is sold as a scientific result, which is only a hypothesis." Together with his two sons, the economic historian's goal that the signs be removed or provided with a question mark. "I have nothing against it, says Schoppe, find" that the visiting that has taken place in them a great battle between Romans and Germans, perhaps the biggest. " But in the Varus battle, there is no single clear note.
is now there in Schoppe trio historian, numismatist and archaeologist. The senior contests Schoppe not start: "In science it is simply a matter of logical thinking" also are not alone because the men Schoppe.. On their website they quote scientists from Tübingen, Hanover and Muenster, which - like them - follow the conclusions of the investigator from the museum Stahnke Kalkriese do not want. Officially it is
reached an agreement: between the lip and the Osnabrück region, between Kalkriese Detmold and was closed in 2009 by the Treaty of peace. Under the title Empire conflict myth put the places Detmold, Holders and Kalkriese for 13 million € a common "exhibition" to.
"annoys us how aggressive Kalkriese occurs - and without any evidence"
But the money can not fill in the trenches!. The spokesman of the circle lip remains. "What we are so angry is that we in Kalkriese the Varus battle so aggressive has claimed, without evidence have" The Lower Saxony state archaeologist Henning Haßmann again asserts the dispute "completely dispassionately to . pursue It is not surprising that in Lipperland brave resistance is offered. "Each local patriots, it is difficult to admit a mistake." On what Side of the international border of the error lies, is unique to the Lower Saxony, "lines up If you in a simple Excel spreadsheet, the arguments will be very clear that they place on their sum Kalkriese the Varus battle related"
stand And then the. irreconcilable adversaries. As a mediator, however, is the retired Peter Glüsing, once at the Department of Prehistory and Early History of the University of Münster. He was especially important, he says that progress would be to research and unearth further evidence - if she were speaking now in favor of or against the Varus battlefield in Kalkriese. And in fact, refers Glüsing, "one can imagine anything out the site of the Varus battle to be. Finally, there abgemurkst thousands of Romans and Germans, and massacred. "
THE TIME, 29.03.2007 No 14

http://zeus.zeit.de/text/2007/14/LS-Varusschlacht

Miosotis Weighing Breasts

book

Our book is now available in bookstores:

Information:
http://www.arminius-varusschlacht.de/Varusschlacht-Schoppe.pdf

order:
http:/ / www.amazon.de/Varusschlacht-arminius-varusschlacht-Christian-M-Schoppe/dp/3833493631

Why Do Hinges Rust In Bathroom

spin Leads

in varus-Courier No. 1, April 2002 (Eds. varus-profit society to promote the pre-and early historic excavations in the Osnabrück eV) I read on page 7 for Hon.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schlueter that he is already in the summer of 1988 Captain Clunn three lead objects presented, which could be identified as sling bullets, they were used by Roman auxiliary troops recruited by the Romans in the Mediterranean. What is not in, is the fact that it regularly to residents in the Balearic slingers acting, the English Mediterranean islands of Mallorca, Menorca, Ibiza and Formentera.
These Iberians were given by the Greek colonists and sailors called "spin" or "stone throwers" (Derived from ballein, ie throw throw,). That the Varus legions XVII Minervia, XVIII Caudiana (XIIX) and XIX Cannensis who were from the eastern Mediterranean to first Gaul and then moved to the Lower Rhine, had no Iberian auxiliary troops, but Gallic and Germanic, we could have then seen already .
This was a very early indication of auxiliary troops of Germanicus, who were among the legions withdrawn from Spain: I Augusta Germanica, II Augusta and V Alaudae - ie to the period 14-16 AD held at 9 n. BC, as Schlueter said again in this post.
This is another evidence of how biased and one-sided dieKalkrieser their findings to the cognitive goal: Varus battle in 9 AD subordinate Kalkriese.

are Yours
Prof. Dr. SG Schoppe

Flaky Dry Skin On Forehead

Opinion on the opening of investigations by the LKA Niedersachsen, in the case Varus Battle Kalkriese after receiving an anonymous display

The events surrounding the excavation site in Kalkriese dubious from the start. In any case, they hold that the determination was premature for the Varus battle, as to date not a single proof of the presence of Varus, but no later than 1996, however some are. The label "Varus Battle", decorate with which the visiting team excavating is, in my opinion, the slippers were stolen from commercial interests out.

must declare one that the "company", the brand, "Varus Battle" assign Kalkriese, particularly the regional and tourism development and its own "scientific community" is used. Whether that conduct justifies a tax profit, was once an open question, because this is examined ex officio by the tax authorities. A non-profit academic work because I personally would deny in this case because the methods used in relation to important results are not scientific.

Whether that unethical behavior is punishable, however, one must - subject to further findings of the investigating authorities - but doubt it. The scandalous behavior defies very reason of a criminal prosecution, not because it can be demonstrated with absolute certainty that funding would not have been paid without the alleged Varus battlefield and who was responsible, at what times each.

was why I paid no display and I intend not to do so. I trust that, in the meantime begun scientific self-cleaning process continues under increasing public pressure on. We must not fail to recognize that Kalkriese claimed as the "site of the Varus battle," even by the scientists there anymore, but now some even doubted is open.

Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe
03/22/2007

Unitards Stores In Vancouver

detectives reviewed allegations of fraud

NOTE: The display is either by Prof. Schoppe, nor to his environment. Our public demands made by clicking here: http://www.arminius-varusschlacht.de/auseinandersetzung.htm We do not believe in anonymous reports.

Varus Battle: Has Kalkriese surreptitiously million?
By Ernst-Wilhelm Pape Detmold / Hannover (WB). "
Two years before the celebration of the jubilee" 2000 Years Varus Battle, the Lower Saxony State Office of Criminal Investigation (LKA) in Hannover evidence of a possible subsidy fraud obtained.

Schoppe Professor: profit check.

Prosecutors must clarify the circumstances under which the non-profit "Varus battle in Osnabrück Land GmbH - Museum and Park has received" several million euros of public funds, said an anonymous whistleblower to the LKA. The millions of donations had been surreptitiously probably using incorrect information.

as 1992 was, for example, in the mouth Kalkriese plate (apron) found a sword scabbard of bronze, which bear the inscription LPA, short for Augusta Legio Prima. I. This legion Germanica but only intervened 14-16 AD in the fighting between Germans and Romans.

That fact is only now but in a book by Professor Dr. Rainer Wiegand (University of Osnabrück) was added, although Wiegels English colleague Paz Gracia-Bellido confirmed in 1996 that the First legion Germanica with the Battle of Varus in 9 Christ is not do have. The public had been deceived, against better knowledge and the retention of scientific facts, according to the anonymous ad that there is this newspaper.

was also the conclusion of the cooperation agreement with the North Rhine-Westphalia partners, Roman museum keepers and lip (here is the Hermann Monument, want the reminder of the Varus battle) on the celebrations in 2009, the Fund probably concealed worden.Das LKA check the information of the whistleblower in detail and inform the public prosecutor at an initial suspicion of Osnabrück.

has also announced the Hamburg University Professor Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe (62) a request to review the charitable status of the GmbH in Kalkriese. For the non-provable theory that the Varus battle took place in Kalkriese, already had more than ten million euros have been spent. It should be investigated urgently, if the LLC has only economic development and tourism on advertising.

news of 20.03. 2007

How Long To Get Results From Zumba

Two years before the anniversary

Bielefeld (ddp-nrw). Two years before the celebration of the jubilee "2000 Years Varus Battle" There seems to be growing evidence that the battle in the Teutoburg Forest has not taken place in Kalkriese in Osnabrück. The Bielefeld reported the "Westfalen-Blatt" (Thursday edition).

early as 1992 had been found in Kalkriese the fender of a scabbard made of bronze, bearing the inscription, LPA, short for "Legio Prima Augusta. This I took but a legion Germanica until 14 to 16 after Christ in the fighting, the newspaper said. In 9 AD, the year of the Varus Battle, was located in Mainz this legion, says in the report.

"It is scandalous that a find of 1992, whose interpretation is established by a foreign expert since 1996, is only now becoming available to the public," said the Hamburg University Professor Siegfried G. Schoppe the "Westfalen-Blatt" . Only now Professor Rainer Wiegand had (University of Osnabrück) "in a new band Roman presence and domination in the Germania of the Augustan age added," that gave him his English colleague Paz Gracia-Bellido in 1996, that it is clearly an abbreviation of a legion that has to do with the Varus Battle nothing.

Moreover occupied discovered Roman shaped ditches and coins found that the legendary Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, in the Cherusci Hermann (Arminius), three Roman legions of Varus defeated country, had not taken place in Kalkriese said Schoppe of the newspaper. The battle took place in the lip, where the Hermann monument stands. It was therefore necessary first anniversary be celebrated there.

The celebrations in 2009, see Kalkriese, instead of the circular lip and the Roman Museum in brackets (Kreis Recklinghausen) and will cost around 13 million €. Patron to Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) are.

(Reuters) © Copyright Reuters News Agency

Source: Free 03/08/1997 Press http://www.freiepresse.de/NACHRICHTEN/KULTUR/842291.html

Implantation Bleeding And Brown

Current publication in March 2007

Apparently it has written the Göttingen Academy of Sciences on their banners, to going astray colleagues at the University of Osnabrück due to the path of scientific virtues. Even the foreword to the anthology: ". Roman presence and domination in the Germania of the Augustan age of Kalkriese The site in the context of recent research and archaeological findings", Göttingen 2007, has what it takes. There, writes Professor Wiegand, carries the varus down Kalkriese largely responsible: "On the discussion of probabilities and weight Evidence should be here at least not forget that must be considered by the strictly methodological-critical approach the question remains as open which military operations of the late Augustan phase of the find site of Kalkriese in the context of varus-battle [is the original] reflects " .

Not only Wiegels ate chalk, and Dr. Susanne Wilbers-Rost, wife of Dr. Rost and by their own self-chief Ausgräberin the Varus battle in Kalkriese, which has recently been contentious always, if you someone her favorite toy . wanted to take it comes under the watchful eyes of the Academy of Sciences and Humanities "to the revealing conclusion:" Maybe arising in this way is also evidence to identify the battlefield with the traditional in the ancient sources hostilities in late Augustan / early Tiberian period "(p. 27). There should not be surprised, after the author over a decade the keyword of her foster father Dr. Schlueter has repeated mantra that she digs the Varus battle in Kalkriese and that all highway and street signs too. Well, then Tiberius, 14 AD ff?

is adventurous as Privatdozent Dr. Boris Dreyer manages to In his later added item "On the development of Varus defeat" the arch of the ancient text sources point to the excavations beating of Kalkriese. First, one is amazed that after a repetition of the assertion that "it is not methodologically correct, look for the slaughter by literary sources" (this is the favorite theme of Zitierkartells Kalkriese), then just to have the incriminating sources the way: from the Weser Detmold about as far away as Kalkriese - in four days, allegedly under the heaviest bombardment of Horn-Bad Meinberg 80 km across the Wiehengebirge!

But what can you expect from a performer who can Varus "northwest along the Teutoburg Forest" march, if he thinks northeast of the Teutoburg Forest - but the north-west. Then the critics of the attacks Dreyer Kalkriese-Zitierkartells To: [!] The company, classified on the basis of archaeological findings, the conflicts in Kalkriese in the attested by literary sources, the total disaster of Varus army posts, lately undertaken efforts against [hear, hear!], the available source material "re-interpret (p. 373).

How does it actually together when it forwards on p. 366 all "literary sources" (his favorite phrase) rejects because they are "different interpretation", then the same interpretive uses and then incriminate other interpretations? And what it has to do with scientific fact, when he last sentence of his contribution to the Detmold again correctly states: "If the reflection of the progress of the Varus defeat [his first convulsive voices made interpretations said], it remains as a conclusion to be noted that the statue of Arminius / Hermann Detmold so far in the wrong place, is that not there - as assumed by the builders of the monument and many others - the Varus army went down, but rather that the north-west [! no, Mr. Dreyer, northeast] of which their downfall began, the completed just west of Kalkriese.

from such a generous person who argues historian can not expect accuracy even in every geographic detail. Perhaps Dreyer wanted with the quality of his Essay revenge, that he was asked later by Wiegand (p. 89) for a contribution of the text sources and Kalkriese should bring back into line: To sum up, do not belong together. This paper has since written until later, do not pass the inspection of the Göttingen Academy of Sciences and falls over the other contributions in terms of quality and differentiation capacity, decreasing considerably. It merely serves the purpose that into perspective later in the conference findings to Kalkriese as the site of Varus battle by not participating in the meeting individual opinion in the proceedings.

Wiegels even balanced similar to Dreyer in the balance. He reads at the mouth of a metal scabbard that there is LPA - and he knows that since the discovery in Kalkriese 1992nd Only now he puts out with the knowledge that he his English colleague, Paz García-Bellido in 1996 (!) Mediated that it is clearly an abbreviation for (L) Egio (P) rima (A) ugusta that had to do so in any way with the First Legion Kalkriese, which lay but first in Spain and varus in Mainz and later as Legio I Germanica was available.

Since all previous finds itself Wiegels with the identifier I of a first cohort and his associates Mrs Franzius led to proceed in such a way is found the image funny findings that there verify louder I. cohorts (or only a first cohort), but found no identifications were legion. Despite intensive search nothing was found by a XVII, XVIII and XIX legion of Varus, but now suddenly several references to the First Legion? This could not be true and are certainly not scientific knowledge, which until this could be prevented at a meeting in June 2004 not in Osnabrück.

Basically, it's scandalous that a find from 1992, since its interpretation by a foreign expert in 1996, it is clear only now, a decade later, the public will be made available. It is nonetheless one of the few empirical indicators to check the varus hypothesis at all. Thus the outside observer may not be surprising that Wiegels in time to the joint session, in 2004 the scientific director of the excavations in Kalkriese to Dr. Moos, a now gave about the camp Regensburg habilitation staff of his department.

finds and colleagues provided critical for continued concern, so that now so painfully Wiegels trying to struggle through a half-truth. So it is not surprising to the reader that Wiegels now a "new Dislokationsgeschichte "Invents: Not the Legion I was in Kalkriese, but only a few cohorts of the same Varus were allocated thus with the Varus defeat in Kalkriese might translate but still a victory for the cartel, and so put off with the last sentence of the reader.." What remains is the hope of further significant discoveries. "Yes, yes, hope dies last, Mr. Wiegand! now so blithely invented a new branch of research, the" Dislokationsgeschichte the Roman Army "(p. 110). Also

Wilber rust rust already has for her husband, a new internationally acclaimed research field, Battle Field Research found after both realized that Varus was not to keep in Kalkriese "battlefield research."

After it was dug so intensely and without any success after the identifications XVII, XVIII and XIX, but only finds the Legion came to light I should be clear to all unbiased scientists that Varus was never in Kalkriese, but Germanicus or Caecina.

for the "Ancient History of the University of Osnabrück" the saying still applies: "If the only ruined reputation, life is unabashedly twice!

And Dr. jur. Joseph Rottmann, the full-time manager of Kalkriese-GmbH, must of course continue the marketing business of promoting tourism operate instead of scientific research.

Yours Sincerely,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe


Source:

Lehmann, GA, Wiegand, R. [Ed] " Roman presence and domination in the Germania of the Augustan age. The site of Kalkriese in the context of recent research and archaeological findings. Reviews of the meeting of the Ancient History of the University of Osnabrück and the Commission, Empire and barbarian 'of the Göttingen Academy of Sciences in Osnabrück on 10 to 12 June 2004. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences in Göttingen. Philological and Historical class: third episode, 279th Band Presented by Prof. G. A. Lehmann at the meeting of 9 December 2005. ", Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2007 (449 pages with 102 illustrations and maps, 196 €, ISBN 978-3-525-82551-8).

New Father Congratulations Funny

scientists settle

In the North West Radio Bremen broadcast on 18 January 2007 distanced himself the head of the archaeological department Varus battle in the Osnabrück region gGmbH "with clear terms of the previously pursued hypothesis of the Varus battle in Kalkriese: it is is rust no longer looking for evidence of the Varus battle, but with her husband them from developing a new branch of science "battle field research" to meet international standards. This

Utterance in a live broadcast is particularly noteworthy because Wilbers-Rost was a foster child of the "Varus-in-Kalkriese" inventor Schlüter from the beginning the most zealous advocate of varus slogan, now on all road signs and letterheads in Kalkriese Area is admired. Their further temporary three-year appointment to 2010 will depend on the goodwill of the nonprofit "Varusschlacht GmbH - Museum and Park" and its Managing Director from Rottmann.

Dr. Schlueter is the first scientific director long retired and enjoys his retirement after for his Varusschlacht fixation nor the title of professor "Taken" as an honorary professor at the University of Osnabrück had.

Whence now the sudden change of mind, the fall is also the industrious Kalkriese-author Dr. Joachim Harnecker? What breaks the previous closed Zitierkartell Kalkriese that by daring scientific interpretations of finds and a lot of money so far held together so tightly and place in a scientific organization in the "Varus-Gesellschaft e. V. in the Osnabrück region" against the better scientific knowledge and any criticism of allies? (By the way go "Varus GmbH" and "varus eV" on the ticket of the profit and under the pretext of scientific Work tax free.)

now suffers from the former owner of the site of "Scientific Charge of the Varus Battle Kalkriese GmbH" and also "2 Chairman of the Varus Battle Association Kalkriese ", Prof. Dr. Rainer Wiegand on his return to scientific work at the Department Universiät Osnabrück increasingly difficult under the conflict between commerce and research. He announced as a split personality at the same time a scientific article: "I in Kalkriese Legion" (in: Roman presence and domination in Germania et seq of the Augustan period, Göttingen 2007, p. 89) and published in the varus-Courier, the Journal of Advertising his varus Association on p. 1-3 a contribution that the club members and sponsors, against better knowledge of the "Cohort I in Kalkriese" reports. Because he is sure that not read the conveyor in the Osnabrück region to 3, and he cheered them there, the associated surprising and syntactically crippled set at: "...; there but probably the name of a legion, not a cohort (sic! ) was used. Was it a Freudian slip tense nervousness?

provides Obviously before the reported varus-in-Kalkriese fan for his scientific reputation, as he must, given the known discoveries and the soon to be discovered in Kalkriese Fund interpretations to his Reputation as a university professor fear that the money the varus friends like he has taken now is to get rid of these pesky appendix for the scientific career. Wiegand tries to repair the damage he has caused sustained over many years. For he was and is the lead agency responsible for all Legion IDs that have been found, it is the I for "Legio I", it is the P for "Legio Prima", 1 as identifiers Cohorts and 1 Centuries interpreted.

For if Varus in 9 AD is set in Kalkriese, then one expects the identities of his three legions XVII, XVIII (XIIX) and XIX, but certainly not the Legion I - Germanica (Augusta) - which lay far away in 9 AD, Mainz, and only under Germanicus and Caecina about 14 to 16 AD, as far north intervened in the Bellum Germanicum. After

in 1993 was the first striking Fund Interpretation: From a legible hallmark M. Aius I Fabrici "invented together with Georgia Wiegels Franzius:" possession of a legionary Marcus Aius who serves in the first cohort in the first hundred, led by Fabricius. But this is still a daring translation in order to divert attention that here I clear the Legion was meant, for among cohorts names is regularly found, the addition or Coh Cohors, missing additions point to the Legion. Since Wiegels

knew that even the P stands as an identifier for the First Legion, he came into this sin first scientific case for more than ten years in the predicament, all I found and P have to make first cohorts. This led to a curious mapping with the startling conclusion that the entire battlefield Kalkriese only a first cohort (cohort I, or more) was on the way (s), seemingly detached from her / Legion n / s, because despite 15 years of excavations not a single long-awaited identification of the 17th, 18th and 19 Legion appeared.

What Kalkrieser science Zitierkartell monopoly and the beginning of the first excavations as permissible corriger la fortune, looked safe in the knowledge that loszueisen huge funding and may soon find the best legions - as a precaution have been fitted in all road signs with the good news - that was the researcher Wiegels more sinister than just P and I appeared. Meanwhile he has given the scientific management and now he writes of the First Legion Kalkriese.

This is the scientific debate over Varus clearly decided in Kalkriese. In the varus-sheet no. 8, 12 Year, December 2006, Wiegand be again the "Cohors I alone in fighting the Germans in Kalkriese" take up, obviously as a last rearguard action of the Osnabrück-Land-Wiegels lobbyists. Maybe it still reaches a call to a chair away from his previous place of work.

How independent but is Dr. Gunther Moose, the following "scientific managers" of the Varus Battle Kalkriese also prominent association lobbyist and also beneficiaries of the foundation of the lectureship, Dr. hc Hartwig Piepenbrock, supporter and former first Chairman of the varus company, service company man in the Osnabrück region, which in return received an honorary doctorate from the University of Osnabrueck? The wonderful openness praises Wiegand, 2nd Chairman, 1 Chairman of the varus society with the words: "Thanks ... your connections to Osnabrück business world ... it has managed to develop the varus society an indispensable part of the financing of a peripheral academic life (sic)". On 8 May 2006, Piepenbrock back, taking with the "earned" Dr. title.

precaution wrote Moos his Habilitation at the Foundation Lectureship, which were designed for him and he was able to get to all the scientific procedures and after many disputes with the help of Mr. Wiegand, non-varus in Kalkriese, although actually funded it fully. What ingratitude! The scientific work of the lecturers Moose is concerned rather with the secure area instead of the Romans in the south with the dangerous quagmire of the Varus battle in the North: Moose is also in the breakaway movement. In the Lower Saxony state parliament, he held on 15 May 2006 speech in order to attract more state funds, which is full of vagueness of the Varus battle in Kalkriese. He also has to master, like his predecessor Wiegels the balancing act between honest science and advocacy, between career and political interests. Above all, he needs time for the end of the 10th Foundation, a university professor lecturer.

And he cheered his indefatigable club members "in the small print" on page 28 of the varus leaflet the message in which he is convinced that no one reads them and who reads them, she does not understand: "In the best case, the investigation of the finds additional arguments for the chronology of the discovery site in the Kalkrieser - (sic!) Lower Valley Wedder deliver "- but not 9 AD?

It will not be so ungrateful, not even against the savings banks, the district, the city of Osnabrueck and against Mr. Grossman, the owner of the steel group, which houses the society in varus Georgsmarienhütte.

Also in Kalkrieser "rust-family monument" There are only literature Kalkriese cartel - all critical Of scientific publications have fallen victim to censorship and are not offered for sale at the bookshop. In his speech in the Chamber of Diet praised Moosbauer the achievements of the new battlefield archeology of Dr. Achim rust from Belm, husband of the excavation director Dr. Susanne Wilbers-Rost: Kalkriese as Lower Saxony medium-sized eligible family business - the best conditions for methodologically clean scientific work. Prepare

While scientists now their withdrawals, the now full-time manager of the cartel Kalkriese varus Kalkriese-ghost market continued aggressive. As he is employed is, the lawyer Dr. Joseph Rottmann, who has never worked historically and scientifically, but not ashamed to put in Kalkriese critics of that very question, as a former local politician and municipal service workers for the District Administrator of Osnabrück, fellow party Manfred Hugo, the flag of the Varus battle in the Osnabrück region stand.

Accordingly, his statements are not qualified, the critics would probably not even expect that Varus had mercifully left his business card; actually Germanicus left his business card, which is just as much at all possible, withheld from the public. We see that the nerve Marketing Officer "2000 Years Varus Battle" made sensitive. Mr. Rottmann with any case before a prayer wheel, that science is taking place there, flowing with the most resources! The anniversary will take place in any case in Kalkriese - it would cost to other public and tax-exempt donations, what the cost. The non-scientist it does not matter if it is the ethics of science on the track.

Only when the media, which have brought about this situation, the Journal of Commerce since 1990 by Werner Kraeling and the world by Felix Kellerhoff ahead, and the companies that fund these scientific minds trip tax deductible (savings banks, Setting Grossman Group MBN GM-hut Egerland logistics and Piepenbrock services group) and the public authorities (state of Lower Saxony, VW Foundation, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, DFG, Germany and EU), payments can this put an end be prepared. It would also need the continued misuse of the taxpayers will end in that the profit of the Savings Bank Foundation, the Association of gGmbH and varus Kalkriese be revoked as surreptitiously. After all, only under the false pretext of scientific work that such person had been entered in the register and given the non-profit status. Tourism promotion is a business purpose not mentioned, not even regional development.

Since the mouth plate of a scabbard made of bronze, found number 10 962, from Oberesch Kalkriese clearly legible and unmistakable the Ritz inscription: LP with = Legio Prima (R. Wiegand: For each category of time is not uncommon, the letter P for "fine" instead of Paragraph "I" ... to designate the First legion Germanica ..., not 1 cohort), in Kalkriese nothing as it was for two decades.

The scientific question: "Varus in Kalkriese" is clearly answered with - of all of the scientists of Kalkriese cartel itself, "No!" who would have even expected. However, it would be asking too much to expect a public confession of the original error. The corrections mind of her own and disappear in the small print in magazines, which does not read the general public.

But the commercial interests of the economically underdeveloped region Brampton and the salaries of varus disciples Moos, Wilbers & Rottmann rust and need to be served. Since the lips scream so loud: "treason"

After the scientific ghost ride abruptly ended in the ditch, the commercial ghost train keeps on their laps: The nightmare is not over.

Yours sincerely, Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe

Mozzarella Poutine Cheese

Kalkriese - demonstrated Gotham String

About this Communication, we are very pleased, especially because the subject is "Kalkriese - Gotham String" has a striking ambiguity - see right :-)

28/01/2007
"Dear Mr. Schoppe,

I'm in summer 2006 with friends from the U.S., which has among others also in Troy Korfmann experience gained with burial sites, often Kalkriese.

We walked in silence and wonder through the . campaign and the whole facility

Even cursory examination makes clear: This is a string of Gotham. What

us is depressed, dumbfounded, and what was discussed during the ride home to Berlin by the fact that such a thing in Germany at all possible.

My friends from archaeological institutes from Cincinnati and Harvard, have lost an illusion from the Culture and Education of Germany and almost meant they would believe the German PISA results now and understand more.

So I would encourage especially to be discouraged when you do not have a reasonable education.

MfG
Hagen Gutcke "

Pubic Pimple Yeast Infections

First Legion Kalkriese unique!

The die plate of a sword scabbard in bronze from the upper Esch Kalkriese ( Fund No. 10 926 ) With clearly the initials "LP " as the Ritz inscription (varus Courier No. 8, Dec. 2006, p. 3 ).

ie clearly L Egio P rima - first Legion .

The findings identified in other "P" was already taken by Prof. Wiegand (see the separate post on the thinking of Professor Wiegand in this context) in connection with the First Legion. The proposed "L" now grants from any lingering doubts.

This proves that Varus could not have been in Kalkriese because the Legio I Germanica 9 AD stationed in Mainz and not involved in the Varus battle (was Marcus Junkelmann, "The legions of Augustus', p. 97, Mainz 1986 ). Legio I Germanica

This was first used by Germanicus 14-16 AD, after their transfer to the Lower Rhine between the Rhine and the Weser.

Mt Sincerely
Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe

Women With One Tooth Images

Prof. Wiegand: But first Legion!

Professor Dr. Rainer Wiegand, deputy chairman of the varus-Gesellschaft in Osnabrück eV speaks first "Kalkrieser" now also the possibility of First Legion in Kalkriese to: " Legio I Kalkriese in to a Ritz inscription on the mouth of a metal scabbard from Kalkriese, in: GA Lehmann, and R. Wiegand (Eds.), Roman presence and domination in the Germania of the Augustan period (Göttingen 20007, p. 89 ff) . What we had been properly concluded from the tank Close-inscriptions of AIUS, now finds most beautiful additional confirmation from further finds that need to be interpreted correctly held manipulative. However, it is extremely difficult to Prof. Wiegand, after the early establishment von1990/93 (along with Wilbers-Rost and Franzius) also now admit publicly what he has long been understood in principle: that the accumulation of I (Legio I) and the P (Legio Prima) Kalkrieser the findings do not mean cohort not Centurie - but Legion!

And that it also quite naturally explains the absence of Varian Legion reference is: The First Legion was in Kalkriese, but not the legions XVII, XVIII and XIX - no trace of it in spite of intensive research! So he published it in fact be highly personal contrast on page 1 and following of the "Varus-Kurier" (information for friends and supporters of the project Kalkriese, Varus battle in the Osnabrück area, Museum and Park, 12 Jg.-I/Dezember 2006) to calm his club members, or even his earlier statement: " In the fight with the Germans - I Cohors in Kalkriese " What a spiritual dislocation: must now Varus by order of the Kalkriese-Zitierkartells with the three legions XVII LEG, LEG XIIX (as the grave stone inscription Xanten) and LEG XIX (CI / 3 cohort, so on a sheet of Dangstetten) with only a first cohort (without Legion ID) and the Germanic tribes of Arminius fight.

long Wiegels is clear that the further I on a plumb line and the P (RIMA) to the mouth of a metal scabbard always mark the first legion, not the first cohort and first centuria. But Wiegels regrets: " is again called a legion cohors I, again - unfortunately - but without legion point for the relevant periods is not unusual for the notation P to prima. Instead of a point, what happened, for example, in a further Ritz inscription on a mouth plate of a sword scabbard Kalkriese in this form, there but probably the name of a legion, not a cohort served .

So there is still hope that scientific integrity against the manipulation of public opinion prevails.

Sincerely,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe

Wire Trapping Coyotes Coyote

Osnabrücker "coins found

Osnabrück region
01/19/2007
A small . battle live on the radio hmd

Bramsche A battle: So much is conceded, but the Varus battle at the end was that.? Prof. Siegfried Schoppe established that Kalkriese do not qualify, "The scientific ghost train, which is to be stopped." The dispute over the legendary battle field going into the next round, and yesterday he could watch the live audience.

The "North West Radio on the road" is always in search of controversial issues and was now in the Osnabrück region find. Lars and the moderator expressed Cohrs like this: "All of Germany is set to Kalkriese All Germany NO Some scientists do not listen to inflexible to resist.?.."

Among the skeptics Heinrich Kemper, chairman of the association "Arminiusforschung", and just Schoppe. Gave in the discussion equal to the key steps: It Kalkriese concern only external funding and promoting tourism. was evidence of the battle it is not. The

but it could not give, "said Dr. Susanne Wilbers-Rost, head of the archaeological department Varus battle in the Osnabrück region. There was only a chain of evidence, and which would become 6000 with found objects such as coins and militaria, and the excavation of a wall facility ever closer. And the scientific justification, says CEO Dr. Joseph Rottmann be done, by far four meetings, a permanent evaluation and occupied with expert scientific advisory board.

But, not only is the demand by Cohrs, speak for another site as the Teutoburg forest? Since Kemper did not specify. As for the excavations, have been lip "slept," said Schoppe [Note: This came from Mr. Kemper, in our opinion is in some way, but rather unwillingly, true: Those who evaluate the coins from Lipper Land, look after for 20 years prefer to Kalkriese, lip remains are left]. That the battle had not taken place, it is convinced Rottmann given 30 finds: "Go for progress in lip Look then we can discuss further..." [Typical of us branded methodology: who can prove otherwise, may say nothing: Scientific untenable]

http://www.neue-oz.de/information/noz_print/osnabruecker_land/15655525.html?SID=1d510fe7577a57a3eda831c0d1c94aae (original message)
[Notes of the blog authors in square brackets]

Bradycardia In Typhoid Fever

Why in Kalkriese the laws of probability overridden?

starting point of the following considerations are the coin hoards:
first Haltern 4056
second Kalkriese-Lutter third pitcher
Kalkriese - Bar collection, Good Barenaue.

According to Frank Berger ( The money of the Roman soldiers, in: Kalkriese - Romans in the Osnabrück region, Brampton 1993) is a sole dominance of the post-Christian coins minted in the coin hoards holders on where primarily stopped the legions XVII, XVIII and XIX (Varus legions). Contrast, the proportion of pre-Christian coins in the two Kalkrieser hoards is greater. This is very surprising given the hypothesis that the three legions of Varus in 9 AD Kalkriese met their end, and under the premise that the two day-care centers are there in connection with the Varus Battle.

any case had initially Theodor Mommsen (derWissenschaften The location of the Varus battle, Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Berlin, Berlin, 1885 ) his assumption of the Varus battle in Kalkriese the coins from Auer Bare land supported, and the visiting today because of the continued support of the coins found their Captain Clunn Varus Battle Kalkriese hypothesis just that.

had But Lodtmann 1753 discovered the first exclusively from Bare Auer land-derived 127 silver and gold coins, the Legion identifiers II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XIII, XV, XVI, XVII and XX , that is statistically 50% (14) of the 28 Roman legions, there was the birth of Christ.

Of the three legions of Varus but there is only one back ( 33%). This seems very unlikely, if only in the local battle Varus legions involved were.

Would Asprenas 9 AD with the two Legions V and XXI in parallel to get in varus Kalkriese in trouble, then we would back up the default probability 50% (1 / 2).

critics of Kalkriese hypothesis argue that it is there at the battle of might have traded on the Pontes Longi . How about because of the probability theory? Caecina was (15 AD) with the legions I, V, XX, XXI way, here is the correlation that is expected back at the 50% (2 / 4).

What about the Angrivarierwall conjecture in Kalkriese? Germanicus was 16 in AD, with the eight legions I, II, V, XIII, XIV, XVI, XX, XXI used so that the significance of 63% (5 / 8) increases.

Thus, the probability for the Angrivarierwall in Kalkriese So far the highest and lowest for the Varus Battle. That should give pause, because in addition by militaria finds the Legion I witnessed is what the probability of Germanicus on Angrivarierwall on 75% (6 / 8) lifts as well as for the Caecina Pontes Longi on 75% (3 / 4), but because of the lower number is not so significant .

The sober World of statistics of chance speaks most strongly against the Varus battle in Kalkriese . Corroborates the assumption that the cartel Kalkriese its monopoly even in the classification and evaluation of the empirical findings at the excavation site exploited. It is high time that the Ombudsman of the DFG appointed a neutral expert who takes all previous finds again inspected. The most suitable would be a numismatist from France because there is to be expected, the greatest expertise regarding the coinage in Gaul (Lyon / Lugdunum).

Sincerely,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe

Fredericton Male Brazilians

classification of the inscription

Georgia Franzius ( The Roman finds from Kalkriese, Brampton 1993) has, under the influence of the then publicly conducted Varusschlacht campaign Kalkriese the hallmark of the bronze buckle of a chain armor of the cavalry: M. AIUS I Fabrici incorrectly translated with " Legionnaires M. Aius served in the first cohort in the centuries of Fabricius . This failure is the result of lack of translation of background knowledge and lack of knowledge of Latin and the reviewer of pressure exerted by the Academic Community, for in a battle of Varus Kalkriese riders were not allowed to even appear a I. Legion.

The correct translation is: " M. I. Aius of the Legion of Fabrizi "; of cohort and Centurie is no question, also composed of Legionnaires' is added; Fabrici (i) is not genitive plural form but also is not a totally unknown Centurienführer. but about the historically significant general and twice consul (282 and 278 BC) Gaius Fabricius Luscinus who purchased in the fighting against Pyrrhus and in the peace negotiations with Pyrrhus as censor in 275 BC eternal fame as a vir vere Romanus . For he had neither responded nor attempted bribery to threats of Pyrrhus (king of Epirus 297-272 BC), as an honest broker between the Greeks and Romans, he also rejected a poison attack Pyrrhus on from this and warned even before. was

The Fallen, the carrier of the tank clasp with the Ritz inscription on the back of M. AII I FAB I, did not belong to the factories, that is a pioneer, but he was a member (or wearing the discarded shell of a Veterans) of the First Legion : Not the cohort or Centurie was at the center, but the legion in the Roman Empire had a name. At the time of Varus, there were 28 legions, and several Legion numbers were assigned several times, so that the highest figure XXII was. In the period of the late monarchy (509 BC), however only two legions were summoned regular. The number of regular legions led by consuls in the Republic was limited to four . were at Caesars' legions of inflation ", which are all counted, not just with cognomina named, were the four consular legions I, II, III and IV depending on their designation of the consuls . It was only under Augustus were these legions to the imperial legions - all with the name of Augusta (Augusta) Germanica, Augusta, (Augusta) and Pia Fidelis (Augusta) Macedonica.

I. The Legion with the greatest tradition was called by their consuls Legio Fabricia in memory of the legendary Republican commander and Consul Luscinus Fabricius. When Augustus the Legion of the Mark Antony in the East had rescued and moved to Spain, he called them I Augusta. Because of misconduct ( M. Junkelmann, The legions of Augustus, Mainz 1986 ) was the first of its name and moved to Augusta deprived Gaul (after 19 BC). Then it was on the Rhine River and later moved to the Lower Rhine, and then ordered by surname Germanica. Because of this history, it is understandable that the members of the First is still some time and that was the Fabrizi called for the continued use of armor, of course not the punches and scoring with inscriptions or FAB Fabrici repaid.

I. The presence of the Legion of Fabrizi Kalkriese is the empirical evidence, the critics been searched in vain, was to prove the impossibility of the Varus battle in Kalkriese. The objection that but the cognomina the legions of typical characteristics, virtues, region names, deities are is through the special position of the consular legions to the time of Augustus declared that all four then rechristened in his own name (Legio Augusta). And who with the plural Fabrici statement (i) does not agree, which may also like to read LEGIO Fabrici (A) thereof.

The attempt to found the above references to verify the Varus battle in Kalkriese "convert coins" has failed them. The tank clasp is the proof of Germanicus and Caecina in Kalkriese.

Sincerely,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe

Glandular Problem Symptoms

Westfalen-Blatt 29/12/2006

Kalkriese is a "million grave"
tax money wasted
Check from Ernst-Wilhelm Pape Detmold (WB).
The waste of taxpayers' money, the hamburgers University Professor Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe (62) the leaders of the nonprofit Varus battle in the country accused of Osnabrück GmbH.
All arguments militate in favor of that legendary battle took place in the Teutoburg Forest in 9 AD in the lip. The thesis that the battle was in Kalkriese in Osnabrück raged, be scientifically untenable, "said Schoppe, a professor at the University Institute of Economic Systems, Economic and theological history. This he would prove the end of January in a forthcoming book.
The extent of the use of public funds in the museum and the excavation site Kalkriese screaming for an investigation. For the Kalkriese thesis more than ten million euros had been spent. Schoppe announced a request to review the charitable interest in the company. The
Taxpayers (BdSt), National Association Niedersachsen / Bremen, believes that at the right site of the Varus Battle are, it runs the risk tap into public funds better to . In accordance with the exclamation of the Emperor Augustus in the face of defeat of the Roman legions against the Cherusci led by Arminius: "There Varus, Varus me back the legions," the Taxpayers Association calls on the Lower Saxony Minister President Christian Wulff (CDU). Christian, Christian, pass on to our Euros. "
The state government in 2006 bewilligt.Ferner for the evaluation of the battlefield finds in Kalkriese EUR 700 000 are in the state budget every year since 2004, 10 000 euros for Kalkriese. This means, according to information from BdSt spokesman Bernhard Zentgraf in the anniversary year 2009 be increased significantly. Also hoped Kalkriese on funds from the European Union.
The chairman of the association in Arminusforschung lip, Heinrich Kemper (CDU-MDL) is the sole representative of Kalkriese in question. Kemper wants the Lower large question mark to stick on the highway signs "Kalkriese site of the Varus Battle" provide .

5th Disease In African Americans

Germany Kölner Stadt Anzeiger Radio

doubt in place of the Varus Battle
Even 1997 years after the Roman general Varus by the Germans were defeated, the battle rages on the historian. This involves the question of where the armed conflict has taken place at that time - whether in the Teutoburg Forest in the lip or circle to demonstrate how recent research seem to Kalkriese close of Osnabrück. The Hamburg historian Siegfried Schoppe has once more thrown in for lip into the breach. All arguments speak for it, he said the Bielefeld Westfalen-Blatt "and announced the publication of new research results. The use of public funds for a museum and the excavation site in Kalkriese he called the other hand, a waste of taxpayers' money.

http://www.dradio.de/kulturnachrichten/200712291800/17 (original message)

Cost Of Movers Brooklyn

29/12/2006

found the place where Varus battle?

Bielefeld - The dispute over the actual site of the Varus battle, there is increasing doubt as to Kalkriese Site of the legendary confrontation. All arguments militate in favor of that legendary battle took place in the Teutoburg Forest in 9 AD, but in Lippe said the Hamburg historian Siegfried G. Schoppe the Bielefeld Westfalen-Blatt (Friday edition). The thesis that the battle had raged in Kalkriese near Osnabrück is scientifically untenable. A corresponding proof, he would lead in a forthcoming book in late January, he adds.
same time accused the historians to the leaders of the nonprofit association Varus battle in the Osnabrück region GmbH waste of taxpayer money. The extent of the use of public funds for the museum and the dig site Kalkriese screaming for an investigation. For the Kalkriese thesis more than ten million euros had been spent. The Hamburg scientist wants to review the charitable status of the GmbH.
After the announcement of the latest scientific findings of the dispute over the actual site of the Varus battle flared up again. Especially interested in history from among lip expressed doubt that really on the excavation site at Kalkriese the remnants of the weapons program of 9 were found after Christ, were received by the three Roman legions of the Cheruscan Arminius (Hermann) annihilated. The battle has historical significance because the expansion of the Roman Empire came to this military defeat on its northern border. (Reuters)

http://www.ksta.de/html/artikel/1167386889128.shtml (original message)

Crochet Slippers On Sheepskin

Kalkriese methodology

What is the success of the media refuted Kalkriese hypothesis to explain - and why any criticism strikes at Kalkriese cartel from?

The reason lies in the fact that this discussion was not a priori out at the scientific level - then had the visiting no chance - advocate, but as a public discussion that serves all stereotypes, the pseudo-scientific views on agents.

The pound, grow with the visiting is the fact that not a German provincial archaeologist on site, but an officer of the British Rhine Army, which has indeed brought the democracy to Germany, the hitherto little suspicious place Kalkriese into the (final) put game: Captain, then Major, Clunn , a neutral referee, but without a scientific background, an avid leisure seekers after militaria, coins and battlefields since its deployment on Hadrian's Wall Durham. His hypothesis: Varus Battle Kalkriese he borrowed from the UK than in Germany recognized experts in Roman law, Roman history and Roman inscriptions and Nobel Laureate for Literature 1902 Theodor Mommsen, who tells of the coin finds of good Barenaue. And the prompt exploratory successes on the ground appeared to be the best way Kalkriese hypothesis to make a sound theory.

With Mommsen, who can not defend more against his one-sided receipt with questionable scientific methods, is in Kalkriese today taken the decisive authority for the Varus Battle hypothesis to complete. His exhibition at the museum there is almost like a saint worship by its believers. But witness the Varus battle he was not, and clairvoyant powers had not even Mommsen - in recognition of all his qualities. Perhaps the visiting Saints need another column to which it can be directed with their prayers, if their hypothesis collapses.

Why are the visiting despite scientifically untenable position with its critics so easily?

first Against the hypothesis Kalkriese contact vehemently the "romantics" who are in the tradition of the epic "Dreizehnlinden" by Friedrich Wilhelm Weber and steadfastly maintain that the west front and the frescoes in the monastery of Corvey were Roman works. They will thus also with respect to disavow their serious arguments on the Varus Battle.

second Many "local historian" - underutilized Pensioners, teachers and pastors - offer lively dance with the motto: "With the capture home in the heart of the world " some 700 sites of the Varus Battle, the "accidental" are always in the vicinity of their residence. It's easy to make these lay for their "limited horizons" too ridiculous.

third Search the Varus battle also feel attracted many who have sunk their roots deep into mythology, mysticism, spiritualism ... and always new stories to the Externsteine , the dolmens, think the Germanic gods and heroes can tell. Since their imagination beyond all limits, these can easily be shrugged off as dreamers, if they comment on the Varus Battle.

4th The critics who would fear the visiting most, which are serious academics , out of the race ; the financial, emotional and familial as well as career-dependencies in the narrow academic community are so entangled that not a self-cleaning process in the scientific contest expected (longer). Although the (remaining) risk that the visiting still find evidence of varus in Kalkriese to neglect objective, for a scientist, but who had publicly attacked the Kalkriese cartel would the personal disaster.

5th Highly motivated opponents of the Kalkrieser "Lippe-Detmold" are. They are losing tourists, the right to the anniversary celebration at the end of 2009 and even still you Hermanns Monument. This Lipper arguments as economically motivated , unscientific and backwoods - just out of the Lippe Forest - dismiss , they also accused of petty parochialism and national narrow-mindedness, definitely Germano, as in the Empire and the Principality of Lippe-Detmold, is cheap. That the same arguments for the district of Osnabrück country or Hannovereaner apply, is back behind it.

6th Behind the cover of their Leaves, behind which it should always put a critical head hidden, leading to responsible editors, world and Handelsblatt in front, directing the public opinion management . Since she originally the visiting with the prospect of quick money and big fame to entice you to leave the set on Kalkriese - the media led the unsuspecting, but publicity-conscious Provincial archeologists like a dancing bear at the nose ring around - take them regularly and indiscriminately party. Critical reviews and letters to be suppressed: the stage is reserved for the visiting performer.

7th "Scribe", the dare to be noted that all sources are in stark contrast to Niewedder Valley and the local findings to be dismissed as text positivists. You have no criticism, because they stick far too good faith to the often distorted texts. You should only prove once an empirically more suitable habitat for the Varus Battle. However, the so-Checked the opposite question is not: " How, then, if not from old sources, the visiting even know of a Varus Battle ?

8th The Varus Battle in Lippi's forest to try to situate science contradicts the opinion formation process in a democracy. The Hermann Monument in the ring wall of the castle was Grote of the Bavarian subject of E. Bandel in the time of national movement started and continued under the Prussian king and German emperor and complete: National (ist) and imperial (ist) at the same time the monument is untenable. Has embraced the German public also so grateful she is for the historically unencumbered offer of a Varus battle in Kalkriese that is given her by a carrier of the Royal Order of Commander of the British Empire, citizens of democratic Urnation, .

For scientific questions one normally expects a scientific argument, but here it is obvious an exceptional issue that calls for a balanced socio-political and politically correct answer.

The Kalkrieser have ensured that the so-called public opinion as to decide "democratic", where the honest imperialists is to put a monument Varus. The museum (sgelände) Varus battle Kalkriese "is the socio-politically necessary counterweight to national (ist) Memorial Hermann the German Empire .

Sincerely,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe

Is Tiffany Towers Married

The misinterpretation Legion badge

Typical is the use of the representatives of Kalkriese-Varusschlacht hypothesis the four tanks found Close , by Franzius ( Georgia Franzius The Roman finds from Kalkriese, Brampton 1993) were first assigned the correct cavalry. On a clasp of a chain armor found on the underside of a hallmark, which Franzius for woman how to read " M. Aius I Fabrici " and "Legionnaire M. Aius in the first cohort in the centuries of translate Fabricius "was. This way it makes its own archaeological research result "four armored cavalry closing" for the closing itself into question, because these people purport to I. cohort to the foot soldiers hearing.

listen here now slowly on the fun: Because Varus perished in Kalkriese with the legions XVII, XVIII and XIX, but not the Legion I. Germanica Augusta , so there may not be true, what should not be true, had the Legion ID I, which had actually been - from a rider who was 16 AD to I. Legion of Germanicus - as a legionary cohort identifier to be read. For Varus had at the end no more cavalry, because they deserted! In fact, 16 AD Germanicus was among other things, the First Legion plus cavalry on Angrivarierwall in Kalkriese: a clear proof against the "Battle of Varus Kalkriese" hypothesis.
The
Kalkrieser are so caught up in their own world that they have to translate compulsively even clear falsification to verification of their hypothesis is And it also madness, yet he has method.

Not the cohort, but the Legion is the identifier and the pride of Roman soldiers. Archaeologists find Legion handles on bricks, on buildings, on bronze tablets ... but not the primary cohort identifiers. As with the V-shaped ditches of the Roman legions in Kalkriese, it has to serve for the Legion ID I an outlandish reinterpretation - without any precedent in archeology.

is probably these are the new methods of "Battlefield Archeology" of its inventor Rost Kalkriese. It is the giant limestone not only managed to persuade Frank Berger with his rather critical Münzbefunden, but also Georgia Franzius the desired interpretations - and keep them from unwanted results. We must not forget that the Legion identifiers refer to all of the coin hoards of Kalkriese exclusively to legions of Germanicus.

If now the managing director of the Museum Park Kalkriese all critics smugly replies that one can not but expect that Varus had deposited his card, he must of course right, because that was never in Kalkriese and at the time of the Battle of Kalkriese was seven years dead

The discovery of the tanks close one has inadvertently demonstrated the presence of a Roman cavalry unit, an Ala, which did in the army of Germanicus service or under Caecina - and BC already under Domitius Ahenobarbus . Because on the inside of a vaginal clamp sword, which has since been found in Kalkriese ( Georgia Franzius and Rainer Wiegand, a Gladiusscheide fittings and parts of a cingulum from Kalkriese, in: Germania, No. 1, 2000, p. 567 -607 ) can be a scribe with inscription " Domitii " of Domitius (Ahenobarbus) Decode although the co-author of Franzius contribution, Rainer Wiegand, rejects this (see Bökemeier Rolf, The Varus Battle, Tübingen 2000, p. 188 ).

Sincerely,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe