Flaky Dry Skin On Forehead

Opinion on the opening of investigations by the LKA Niedersachsen, in the case Varus Battle Kalkriese after receiving an anonymous display

The events surrounding the excavation site in Kalkriese dubious from the start. In any case, they hold that the determination was premature for the Varus battle, as to date not a single proof of the presence of Varus, but no later than 1996, however some are. The label "Varus Battle", decorate with which the visiting team excavating is, in my opinion, the slippers were stolen from commercial interests out.

must declare one that the "company", the brand, "Varus Battle" assign Kalkriese, particularly the regional and tourism development and its own "scientific community" is used. Whether that conduct justifies a tax profit, was once an open question, because this is examined ex officio by the tax authorities. A non-profit academic work because I personally would deny in this case because the methods used in relation to important results are not scientific.

Whether that unethical behavior is punishable, however, one must - subject to further findings of the investigating authorities - but doubt it. The scandalous behavior defies very reason of a criminal prosecution, not because it can be demonstrated with absolute certainty that funding would not have been paid without the alleged Varus battlefield and who was responsible, at what times each.

was why I paid no display and I intend not to do so. I trust that, in the meantime begun scientific self-cleaning process continues under increasing public pressure on. We must not fail to recognize that Kalkriese claimed as the "site of the Varus battle," even by the scientists there anymore, but now some even doubted is open.

Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe
03/22/2007

Unitards Stores In Vancouver

detectives reviewed allegations of fraud

NOTE: The display is either by Prof. Schoppe, nor to his environment. Our public demands made by clicking here: http://www.arminius-varusschlacht.de/auseinandersetzung.htm We do not believe in anonymous reports.

Varus Battle: Has Kalkriese surreptitiously million?
By Ernst-Wilhelm Pape Detmold / Hannover (WB). "
Two years before the celebration of the jubilee" 2000 Years Varus Battle, the Lower Saxony State Office of Criminal Investigation (LKA) in Hannover evidence of a possible subsidy fraud obtained.

Schoppe Professor: profit check.

Prosecutors must clarify the circumstances under which the non-profit "Varus battle in Osnabrück Land GmbH - Museum and Park has received" several million euros of public funds, said an anonymous whistleblower to the LKA. The millions of donations had been surreptitiously probably using incorrect information.

as 1992 was, for example, in the mouth Kalkriese plate (apron) found a sword scabbard of bronze, which bear the inscription LPA, short for Augusta Legio Prima. I. This legion Germanica but only intervened 14-16 AD in the fighting between Germans and Romans.

That fact is only now but in a book by Professor Dr. Rainer Wiegand (University of Osnabrück) was added, although Wiegels English colleague Paz Gracia-Bellido confirmed in 1996 that the First legion Germanica with the Battle of Varus in 9 Christ is not do have. The public had been deceived, against better knowledge and the retention of scientific facts, according to the anonymous ad that there is this newspaper.

was also the conclusion of the cooperation agreement with the North Rhine-Westphalia partners, Roman museum keepers and lip (here is the Hermann Monument, want the reminder of the Varus battle) on the celebrations in 2009, the Fund probably concealed worden.Das LKA check the information of the whistleblower in detail and inform the public prosecutor at an initial suspicion of Osnabrück.

has also announced the Hamburg University Professor Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe (62) a request to review the charitable status of the GmbH in Kalkriese. For the non-provable theory that the Varus battle took place in Kalkriese, already had more than ten million euros have been spent. It should be investigated urgently, if the LLC has only economic development and tourism on advertising.

news of 20.03. 2007

How Long To Get Results From Zumba

Two years before the anniversary

Bielefeld (ddp-nrw). Two years before the celebration of the jubilee "2000 Years Varus Battle" There seems to be growing evidence that the battle in the Teutoburg Forest has not taken place in Kalkriese in Osnabrück. The Bielefeld reported the "Westfalen-Blatt" (Thursday edition).

early as 1992 had been found in Kalkriese the fender of a scabbard made of bronze, bearing the inscription, LPA, short for "Legio Prima Augusta. This I took but a legion Germanica until 14 to 16 after Christ in the fighting, the newspaper said. In 9 AD, the year of the Varus Battle, was located in Mainz this legion, says in the report.

"It is scandalous that a find of 1992, whose interpretation is established by a foreign expert since 1996, is only now becoming available to the public," said the Hamburg University Professor Siegfried G. Schoppe the "Westfalen-Blatt" . Only now Professor Rainer Wiegand had (University of Osnabrück) "in a new band Roman presence and domination in the Germania of the Augustan age added," that gave him his English colleague Paz Gracia-Bellido in 1996, that it is clearly an abbreviation of a legion that has to do with the Varus Battle nothing.

Moreover occupied discovered Roman shaped ditches and coins found that the legendary Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, in the Cherusci Hermann (Arminius), three Roman legions of Varus defeated country, had not taken place in Kalkriese said Schoppe of the newspaper. The battle took place in the lip, where the Hermann monument stands. It was therefore necessary first anniversary be celebrated there.

The celebrations in 2009, see Kalkriese, instead of the circular lip and the Roman Museum in brackets (Kreis Recklinghausen) and will cost around 13 million €. Patron to Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) are.

(Reuters) © Copyright Reuters News Agency

Source: Free 03/08/1997 Press http://www.freiepresse.de/NACHRICHTEN/KULTUR/842291.html

Implantation Bleeding And Brown

Current publication in March 2007

Apparently it has written the Göttingen Academy of Sciences on their banners, to going astray colleagues at the University of Osnabrück due to the path of scientific virtues. Even the foreword to the anthology: ". Roman presence and domination in the Germania of the Augustan age of Kalkriese The site in the context of recent research and archaeological findings", Göttingen 2007, has what it takes. There, writes Professor Wiegand, carries the varus down Kalkriese largely responsible: "On the discussion of probabilities and weight Evidence should be here at least not forget that must be considered by the strictly methodological-critical approach the question remains as open which military operations of the late Augustan phase of the find site of Kalkriese in the context of varus-battle [is the original] reflects " .

Not only Wiegels ate chalk, and Dr. Susanne Wilbers-Rost, wife of Dr. Rost and by their own self-chief Ausgräberin the Varus battle in Kalkriese, which has recently been contentious always, if you someone her favorite toy . wanted to take it comes under the watchful eyes of the Academy of Sciences and Humanities "to the revealing conclusion:" Maybe arising in this way is also evidence to identify the battlefield with the traditional in the ancient sources hostilities in late Augustan / early Tiberian period "(p. 27). There should not be surprised, after the author over a decade the keyword of her foster father Dr. Schlueter has repeated mantra that she digs the Varus battle in Kalkriese and that all highway and street signs too. Well, then Tiberius, 14 AD ff?

is adventurous as Privatdozent Dr. Boris Dreyer manages to In his later added item "On the development of Varus defeat" the arch of the ancient text sources point to the excavations beating of Kalkriese. First, one is amazed that after a repetition of the assertion that "it is not methodologically correct, look for the slaughter by literary sources" (this is the favorite theme of Zitierkartells Kalkriese), then just to have the incriminating sources the way: from the Weser Detmold about as far away as Kalkriese - in four days, allegedly under the heaviest bombardment of Horn-Bad Meinberg 80 km across the Wiehengebirge!

But what can you expect from a performer who can Varus "northwest along the Teutoburg Forest" march, if he thinks northeast of the Teutoburg Forest - but the north-west. Then the critics of the attacks Dreyer Kalkriese-Zitierkartells To: [!] The company, classified on the basis of archaeological findings, the conflicts in Kalkriese in the attested by literary sources, the total disaster of Varus army posts, lately undertaken efforts against [hear, hear!], the available source material "re-interpret (p. 373).

How does it actually together when it forwards on p. 366 all "literary sources" (his favorite phrase) rejects because they are "different interpretation", then the same interpretive uses and then incriminate other interpretations? And what it has to do with scientific fact, when he last sentence of his contribution to the Detmold again correctly states: "If the reflection of the progress of the Varus defeat [his first convulsive voices made interpretations said], it remains as a conclusion to be noted that the statue of Arminius / Hermann Detmold so far in the wrong place, is that not there - as assumed by the builders of the monument and many others - the Varus army went down, but rather that the north-west [! no, Mr. Dreyer, northeast] of which their downfall began, the completed just west of Kalkriese.

from such a generous person who argues historian can not expect accuracy even in every geographic detail. Perhaps Dreyer wanted with the quality of his Essay revenge, that he was asked later by Wiegand (p. 89) for a contribution of the text sources and Kalkriese should bring back into line: To sum up, do not belong together. This paper has since written until later, do not pass the inspection of the Göttingen Academy of Sciences and falls over the other contributions in terms of quality and differentiation capacity, decreasing considerably. It merely serves the purpose that into perspective later in the conference findings to Kalkriese as the site of Varus battle by not participating in the meeting individual opinion in the proceedings.

Wiegels even balanced similar to Dreyer in the balance. He reads at the mouth of a metal scabbard that there is LPA - and he knows that since the discovery in Kalkriese 1992nd Only now he puts out with the knowledge that he his English colleague, Paz García-Bellido in 1996 (!) Mediated that it is clearly an abbreviation for (L) Egio (P) rima (A) ugusta that had to do so in any way with the First Legion Kalkriese, which lay but first in Spain and varus in Mainz and later as Legio I Germanica was available.

Since all previous finds itself Wiegels with the identifier I of a first cohort and his associates Mrs Franzius led to proceed in such a way is found the image funny findings that there verify louder I. cohorts (or only a first cohort), but found no identifications were legion. Despite intensive search nothing was found by a XVII, XVIII and XIX legion of Varus, but now suddenly several references to the First Legion? This could not be true and are certainly not scientific knowledge, which until this could be prevented at a meeting in June 2004 not in Osnabrück.

Basically, it's scandalous that a find from 1992, since its interpretation by a foreign expert in 1996, it is clear only now, a decade later, the public will be made available. It is nonetheless one of the few empirical indicators to check the varus hypothesis at all. Thus the outside observer may not be surprising that Wiegels in time to the joint session, in 2004 the scientific director of the excavations in Kalkriese to Dr. Moos, a now gave about the camp Regensburg habilitation staff of his department.

finds and colleagues provided critical for continued concern, so that now so painfully Wiegels trying to struggle through a half-truth. So it is not surprising to the reader that Wiegels now a "new Dislokationsgeschichte "Invents: Not the Legion I was in Kalkriese, but only a few cohorts of the same Varus were allocated thus with the Varus defeat in Kalkriese might translate but still a victory for the cartel, and so put off with the last sentence of the reader.." What remains is the hope of further significant discoveries. "Yes, yes, hope dies last, Mr. Wiegand! now so blithely invented a new branch of research, the" Dislokationsgeschichte the Roman Army "(p. 110). Also

Wilber rust rust already has for her husband, a new internationally acclaimed research field, Battle Field Research found after both realized that Varus was not to keep in Kalkriese "battlefield research."

After it was dug so intensely and without any success after the identifications XVII, XVIII and XIX, but only finds the Legion came to light I should be clear to all unbiased scientists that Varus was never in Kalkriese, but Germanicus or Caecina.

for the "Ancient History of the University of Osnabrück" the saying still applies: "If the only ruined reputation, life is unabashedly twice!

And Dr. jur. Joseph Rottmann, the full-time manager of Kalkriese-GmbH, must of course continue the marketing business of promoting tourism operate instead of scientific research.

Yours Sincerely,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe


Source:

Lehmann, GA, Wiegand, R. [Ed] " Roman presence and domination in the Germania of the Augustan age. The site of Kalkriese in the context of recent research and archaeological findings. Reviews of the meeting of the Ancient History of the University of Osnabrück and the Commission, Empire and barbarian 'of the Göttingen Academy of Sciences in Osnabrück on 10 to 12 June 2004. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences in Göttingen. Philological and Historical class: third episode, 279th Band Presented by Prof. G. A. Lehmann at the meeting of 9 December 2005. ", Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2007 (449 pages with 102 illustrations and maps, 196 €, ISBN 978-3-525-82551-8).

New Father Congratulations Funny

scientists settle

In the North West Radio Bremen broadcast on 18 January 2007 distanced himself the head of the archaeological department Varus battle in the Osnabrück region gGmbH "with clear terms of the previously pursued hypothesis of the Varus battle in Kalkriese: it is is rust no longer looking for evidence of the Varus battle, but with her husband them from developing a new branch of science "battle field research" to meet international standards. This

Utterance in a live broadcast is particularly noteworthy because Wilbers-Rost was a foster child of the "Varus-in-Kalkriese" inventor Schlüter from the beginning the most zealous advocate of varus slogan, now on all road signs and letterheads in Kalkriese Area is admired. Their further temporary three-year appointment to 2010 will depend on the goodwill of the nonprofit "Varusschlacht GmbH - Museum and Park" and its Managing Director from Rottmann.

Dr. Schlueter is the first scientific director long retired and enjoys his retirement after for his Varusschlacht fixation nor the title of professor "Taken" as an honorary professor at the University of Osnabrück had.

Whence now the sudden change of mind, the fall is also the industrious Kalkriese-author Dr. Joachim Harnecker? What breaks the previous closed Zitierkartell Kalkriese that by daring scientific interpretations of finds and a lot of money so far held together so tightly and place in a scientific organization in the "Varus-Gesellschaft e. V. in the Osnabrück region" against the better scientific knowledge and any criticism of allies? (By the way go "Varus GmbH" and "varus eV" on the ticket of the profit and under the pretext of scientific Work tax free.)

now suffers from the former owner of the site of "Scientific Charge of the Varus Battle Kalkriese GmbH" and also "2 Chairman of the Varus Battle Association Kalkriese ", Prof. Dr. Rainer Wiegand on his return to scientific work at the Department Universiät Osnabrück increasingly difficult under the conflict between commerce and research. He announced as a split personality at the same time a scientific article: "I in Kalkriese Legion" (in: Roman presence and domination in Germania et seq of the Augustan period, Göttingen 2007, p. 89) and published in the varus-Courier, the Journal of Advertising his varus Association on p. 1-3 a contribution that the club members and sponsors, against better knowledge of the "Cohort I in Kalkriese" reports. Because he is sure that not read the conveyor in the Osnabrück region to 3, and he cheered them there, the associated surprising and syntactically crippled set at: "...; there but probably the name of a legion, not a cohort (sic! ) was used. Was it a Freudian slip tense nervousness?

provides Obviously before the reported varus-in-Kalkriese fan for his scientific reputation, as he must, given the known discoveries and the soon to be discovered in Kalkriese Fund interpretations to his Reputation as a university professor fear that the money the varus friends like he has taken now is to get rid of these pesky appendix for the scientific career. Wiegand tries to repair the damage he has caused sustained over many years. For he was and is the lead agency responsible for all Legion IDs that have been found, it is the I for "Legio I", it is the P for "Legio Prima", 1 as identifiers Cohorts and 1 Centuries interpreted.

For if Varus in 9 AD is set in Kalkriese, then one expects the identities of his three legions XVII, XVIII (XIIX) and XIX, but certainly not the Legion I - Germanica (Augusta) - which lay far away in 9 AD, Mainz, and only under Germanicus and Caecina about 14 to 16 AD, as far north intervened in the Bellum Germanicum. After

in 1993 was the first striking Fund Interpretation: From a legible hallmark M. Aius I Fabrici "invented together with Georgia Wiegels Franzius:" possession of a legionary Marcus Aius who serves in the first cohort in the first hundred, led by Fabricius. But this is still a daring translation in order to divert attention that here I clear the Legion was meant, for among cohorts names is regularly found, the addition or Coh Cohors, missing additions point to the Legion. Since Wiegels

knew that even the P stands as an identifier for the First Legion, he came into this sin first scientific case for more than ten years in the predicament, all I found and P have to make first cohorts. This led to a curious mapping with the startling conclusion that the entire battlefield Kalkriese only a first cohort (cohort I, or more) was on the way (s), seemingly detached from her / Legion n / s, because despite 15 years of excavations not a single long-awaited identification of the 17th, 18th and 19 Legion appeared.

What Kalkrieser science Zitierkartell monopoly and the beginning of the first excavations as permissible corriger la fortune, looked safe in the knowledge that loszueisen huge funding and may soon find the best legions - as a precaution have been fitted in all road signs with the good news - that was the researcher Wiegels more sinister than just P and I appeared. Meanwhile he has given the scientific management and now he writes of the First Legion Kalkriese.

This is the scientific debate over Varus clearly decided in Kalkriese. In the varus-sheet no. 8, 12 Year, December 2006, Wiegand be again the "Cohors I alone in fighting the Germans in Kalkriese" take up, obviously as a last rearguard action of the Osnabrück-Land-Wiegels lobbyists. Maybe it still reaches a call to a chair away from his previous place of work.

How independent but is Dr. Gunther Moose, the following "scientific managers" of the Varus Battle Kalkriese also prominent association lobbyist and also beneficiaries of the foundation of the lectureship, Dr. hc Hartwig Piepenbrock, supporter and former first Chairman of the varus company, service company man in the Osnabrück region, which in return received an honorary doctorate from the University of Osnabrueck? The wonderful openness praises Wiegand, 2nd Chairman, 1 Chairman of the varus society with the words: "Thanks ... your connections to Osnabrück business world ... it has managed to develop the varus society an indispensable part of the financing of a peripheral academic life (sic)". On 8 May 2006, Piepenbrock back, taking with the "earned" Dr. title.

precaution wrote Moos his Habilitation at the Foundation Lectureship, which were designed for him and he was able to get to all the scientific procedures and after many disputes with the help of Mr. Wiegand, non-varus in Kalkriese, although actually funded it fully. What ingratitude! The scientific work of the lecturers Moose is concerned rather with the secure area instead of the Romans in the south with the dangerous quagmire of the Varus battle in the North: Moose is also in the breakaway movement. In the Lower Saxony state parliament, he held on 15 May 2006 speech in order to attract more state funds, which is full of vagueness of the Varus battle in Kalkriese. He also has to master, like his predecessor Wiegels the balancing act between honest science and advocacy, between career and political interests. Above all, he needs time for the end of the 10th Foundation, a university professor lecturer.

And he cheered his indefatigable club members "in the small print" on page 28 of the varus leaflet the message in which he is convinced that no one reads them and who reads them, she does not understand: "In the best case, the investigation of the finds additional arguments for the chronology of the discovery site in the Kalkrieser - (sic!) Lower Valley Wedder deliver "- but not 9 AD?

It will not be so ungrateful, not even against the savings banks, the district, the city of Osnabrueck and against Mr. Grossman, the owner of the steel group, which houses the society in varus Georgsmarienhütte.

Also in Kalkrieser "rust-family monument" There are only literature Kalkriese cartel - all critical Of scientific publications have fallen victim to censorship and are not offered for sale at the bookshop. In his speech in the Chamber of Diet praised Moosbauer the achievements of the new battlefield archeology of Dr. Achim rust from Belm, husband of the excavation director Dr. Susanne Wilbers-Rost: Kalkriese as Lower Saxony medium-sized eligible family business - the best conditions for methodologically clean scientific work. Prepare

While scientists now their withdrawals, the now full-time manager of the cartel Kalkriese varus Kalkriese-ghost market continued aggressive. As he is employed is, the lawyer Dr. Joseph Rottmann, who has never worked historically and scientifically, but not ashamed to put in Kalkriese critics of that very question, as a former local politician and municipal service workers for the District Administrator of Osnabrück, fellow party Manfred Hugo, the flag of the Varus battle in the Osnabrück region stand.

Accordingly, his statements are not qualified, the critics would probably not even expect that Varus had mercifully left his business card; actually Germanicus left his business card, which is just as much at all possible, withheld from the public. We see that the nerve Marketing Officer "2000 Years Varus Battle" made sensitive. Mr. Rottmann with any case before a prayer wheel, that science is taking place there, flowing with the most resources! The anniversary will take place in any case in Kalkriese - it would cost to other public and tax-exempt donations, what the cost. The non-scientist it does not matter if it is the ethics of science on the track.

Only when the media, which have brought about this situation, the Journal of Commerce since 1990 by Werner Kraeling and the world by Felix Kellerhoff ahead, and the companies that fund these scientific minds trip tax deductible (savings banks, Setting Grossman Group MBN GM-hut Egerland logistics and Piepenbrock services group) and the public authorities (state of Lower Saxony, VW Foundation, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, DFG, Germany and EU), payments can this put an end be prepared. It would also need the continued misuse of the taxpayers will end in that the profit of the Savings Bank Foundation, the Association of gGmbH and varus Kalkriese be revoked as surreptitiously. After all, only under the false pretext of scientific work that such person had been entered in the register and given the non-profit status. Tourism promotion is a business purpose not mentioned, not even regional development.

Since the mouth plate of a scabbard made of bronze, found number 10 962, from Oberesch Kalkriese clearly legible and unmistakable the Ritz inscription: LP with = Legio Prima (R. Wiegand: For each category of time is not uncommon, the letter P for "fine" instead of Paragraph "I" ... to designate the First legion Germanica ..., not 1 cohort), in Kalkriese nothing as it was for two decades.

The scientific question: "Varus in Kalkriese" is clearly answered with - of all of the scientists of Kalkriese cartel itself, "No!" who would have even expected. However, it would be asking too much to expect a public confession of the original error. The corrections mind of her own and disappear in the small print in magazines, which does not read the general public.

But the commercial interests of the economically underdeveloped region Brampton and the salaries of varus disciples Moos, Wilbers & Rottmann rust and need to be served. Since the lips scream so loud: "treason"

After the scientific ghost ride abruptly ended in the ditch, the commercial ghost train keeps on their laps: The nightmare is not over.

Yours sincerely, Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Schoppe